Get The Latest Updates

33 Organizations Demand a Vote!

On July 1, the Win Without War coalition joined with 32 other organizations to urge Congress to demand a vote before any bombs fall on Iraq.

July 1, 2014

Dear Member of Congress,

The undersigned groups urge you to support the bipartisan Rigell-Lee letter to President Obama urging “respect for the constitutional requirements for using force abroad.”

As the letter notes:

“The Constitution vests in Congress the power and responsibility to authorize offensive military action abroad. The use of military force in Iraq is something the Congress should fully debate and authorize.  Members of Congress must consider all the facts and alternatives before we can determine whether military action would contribute to ending this most recent violence, create a climate for political stability, and protect civilians from greater harm.”

There are few decisions our elected officials make that carry more weight than the decision to use military force. The consequences and the costs of even limited military interventions may be felt for years to come. It is precisely for these reasons that the Constitution’s framers firmly entrusted this authority to the people’s representatives in Congress.

The current situation in Iraq has grabbed the nation’s attention, and the President has already deployed US military personnel and assets in response to the crisis. Yet the President and Administration officials have also suggested that the US military may take further action, including potentially airstrikes and other uses of military force. Some news reports have also suggested that, unlike in the case of Syria, the President may not seek authorization from Congress.

While our organizations may not agree on the specific steps the United States should take in Iraq, we all agree on one thing, the use of military force would require new Congressional authorization.

In announcing his decision to request the authorization to use military force in Syria last year, President Obama said, “our power is rooted not in our military might, but in our example as a government of the people, by the people, and for the people.” The President was right. As the world’s oldest constitutional democracy, we should once again demonstrate our commitment to the framers’ wisdom and demand that any use of military force in Iraq first be authorized by Congress.

We strongly urge you to press the President to seek Congressional authorization before using military force in Iraq by signing the Rigell-Lee letter.

Sincerely,

Campaign for Liberty

Center for Foreign and Defense Policy

Center for International Policy

Citizen Outreach

Civilian Soldier Alliance

CODEPINK

Come Home America

Council for a Livable World

CREDO

Downsize DC

Friends Committee on National Legislation

Iraq Veterans Against the War

Just Foreign Policy

Liberty Coalition

MoveOn.org

National Council of Churches

Peace Action

Peace Action West

Physicians for Social Responsibility

Popular Resistance

Progressive Democrats of America

Republican Liberty Caucus

RootsAction.org 

Rutherford Institute

United for Peace and Justice

United Methoidst Church, General Board of Church and Society

U.S. Labor Against the War

USAction

Veteran Intelligence Professionals for Sanity

Veterans For Peace

WarIsACrime.org

Win Without War

Women’s Action for New Directions

Needed: An International Strategy in Iraq

August 21st, 2014

The crisis in Iraq poses two challenges — a humanitarian effort to rescue persecuted minorities, and a security mission to suppress the extremist threat posed by the forces of the Islamic State in Iraq and Syria (ISIS). The U.S. is right to play a leading role in aiding the Yazidis, Christians, a  Continue >>

Experts Agree: Aid not airstrikes to help Iraq!

August 20th, 2014

Experts agree: U.S. airstrikes are not the solution to the crisis in Iraq! Read what they've said, then take action by emailing the President and Congress! Members of Congress Sen. Richard Blumenthal (D-CT)- “I oppose open-ended military commitments, which the President’s actions in Iraq could bec  Continue >>